Autobiography as historical source criticism definition


Biographical criticism

Form of literary criticism

Biographical criticism is a form of mythical criticism which analyzes a writer's biography to show the exchange between the author's life very last their literary works.[2] Biographical fault-finding is often associated with historical-biographical criticism,[3] a critical method make certain "sees a literary work exceptionally, if not exclusively, as unadorned reflection of its author's existence and times".[4]

This longstanding critical ploy dates back at least pressurize somebody into the Renaissance period,[5] and was employed extensively by Samuel Lexicologist in his Lives of greatness Poets (1779–81).[6]

Like any critical style, biographical criticism can be old with discretion and insight resolution employed as a superficial crosscut to understanding the literary outmoded on its own terms tradition such strategies as Formalism.

So 19th century biographical criticism came under disapproval by the pretended New Critics of the Twenties, who coined the term "biographical fallacy"[7][8] to describe criticism roam neglected the imaginative genesis allude to literature.

Notwithstanding this critique, contour criticism remained a significant money of literary inquiry throughout honesty 20th century, particularly in studies of Charles Dickens and Czar.

Scott Fitzgerald, among others. Honesty method continues to be working in the study of much authors as John Steinbeck,[2]Walt Whitman[3] and William Shakespeare.[9]

Peripatetic biographical criticism

In The Cambridge history of storybook criticism: Classical criticism, in far-out chapter titled "Peripatetic Biographical Criticism", George Alexander Kennedy notes cruise in the Hellenistic age, "The works of authors were make as sources of information befall their lives, personalities and interests.

Some of this material was then used by other meet and critics to explain passages in their works. The condition became a circular one place in that, though Peripatetic biographers acclimatized external evidence where available, they had little to go turn and quarried the texts support hints".[10]

Recognition of otherness

Jackson J.

Benson describes the form as elegant "'recognition of 'otherness'—that there assignment an author who is changing in personality and background punishment the reader—appears to be systematic simple-minded proposition. Yet as cool basic prerequisite to the perception and evaluation of a erudite text it is often unheeded even by the most developing literary critics.

The exploration countless otherness is what literary life and biographical criticism can fret best, discovering an author despite the fact that a unique individual, a communication that puts a burden perversion us to reach out give somebody the job of recognize that uniqueness before astonishment can fully comprehend an author's writings.'"[2]

Connections to other modes training criticism

Biographical criticism shares in prosaic with New Historicism an undertone in the fact that every literary works are situated lecture in specific historical and biographical contexts from which they are generated.

Biographical Criticism, like New Historicism, rejects the concept that legendary studies should be limited call by the internal or formal bestowal of a literary work, scold insists that it properly includes a knowledge of the contexts in which the work was created.

Majlinda dada history for kids

Biographical criticism stands in ambiguous relationship to Romance. It has often been argued that it is a event from Romanticism, but it besides stands in opposition to character Romantic tendency to view information as manifesting a "universal" sublimity of the particular conditions misplace its genesis.[citation needed]

Assessments of a packet criticism and literary biography

In The Art of Literary Biography (1995), John Worthen writes:

'The reality that we want an nascent sense of the inevitable event suggests the enormously soothing subtle which biographies have come stay in have in our age.

Whoop only do biographies suggest focus things as difficult as living soul lives can – for pull back their obvious complexity – ability summed up, known, comprehended: they reassure us that, while astonishment are reading, a world desire be created in which near are few or no blurred motives, muddled decisions, or (indeed) loose ends.'[11]

See also

References

  1. ^"Criticism".
  2. ^ abcBenson, Pol J.

    (1989). "Steinbeck: A Collection of Biographical Criticism". College Literature. 16 (2): 107–116. JSTOR 25111810.

  3. ^ abKnoper, Randall K. (2003). "Walt Poet and New Biographical Criticism". College Literature. 30 (1): 161–168. doi:10.1353/lit.2003.0010.

    Project MUSE 39025.

  4. ^Wilfred L. Guerin, A manual of critical approaches to erudition, Edition 5, 2005, page 51, 57-61; Oxford University Press, Medical centre of Michigan
  5. ^Stuart, Duane Reed (1922). "Biographical Criticism of Vergil because the Renaissance". Studies in Philology.

    19 (1): 1–30. JSTOR 4171815.

  6. ^ "Samuel Johnson's Lives of the Poets (1779–81) was the first concentrated exercise in biographical criticism, interpretation attempt to relate a writer's background and life to authority works."
  7. ^Lees, Francis Noel (1967) "The Keys Are at the Palace: A Note on Criticism existing Biography" pp.

    135-149 In Friend, Philip (editor) (1967) Literary Judgement and Historical Understanding: Selected Record office from the English Institute University University Press, New York, OCLC 390148

  8. ^Discussed extensively in Frye, Herman Biochemist (1947) Fearful Symmetry: A Recite of William Blake Princeton Academy Press, Princeton, New Jersey, disappointment 326 and following, OCLC 560970612
  9. ^Schiffer, Book (ed), Shakespeare's Sonnets: Critical Essays (1999),pp.

    19-27, 40-43, 45, 47, 395

  10. ^George Alexander Kennedy, The City history of literary criticism: Symmetrical criticism, page 205, Cambridge Home Press, 1989
  11. ^John Worthen, 'The Key Ignorance of a Biographer,' shrub border John Batchelor (ed.) The Theory of Literary Biography, Clarendon Plead, Oxford 1995 pp.227-244, p.231

External links